0 votes
in Living by
Some states are wanting to lower the age to as young as 12.

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

23 Answers

0 votes
by
At 12 one knows the difference between right and wrong. If a youthful offender did something terrible to one of my loved ones, I would not be interested in the kind of ********* he or she had or their mental capacity, I would only be interested in their punishment.
0 votes
by
Tough question. In most cases, I say 18 is the right age. But, when the offender is truly dangerous, it simply isn't enough to have him incarcerated for a few months, until he turns 18, then set him loose to victimize someone again.
0 votes
by
Depends on what crime is done
0 votes
by
This tells me our society is getting worse at an ever younger age...I believe ******** committing ***** crimes should be charged the same as an *****, right along with their parents.
0 votes
by
Undecided
0 votes
by
Amazing how people have come up with a random number that is supposed to determine a person rights and responsibilities,...
0 votes
by
It depends on the crime and the individual. If the crime is violent in nature like ****, *******, or murder, yes they should be charged as an *****.
0 votes
by
18
0 votes
by
As long as they lower all the other things that go with being an ***** too, like drinking, driving, ***, getting a job, leaving home etc...either your an ***** or your not.
0 votes
by
18
0 votes
by
At 12 one knows the difference between right and wrong. If a youthful offender did something terrible to one of my loved ones, I would not be interested in the kind of ********* he or she had or their mental capacity, I would only be interested in their punishment.
0 votes
by
Depends on the crime.
0 votes
by
Old enough to do the crime then old enough to do the time.
0 votes
by
Not where I live. They keep them in separate facilities, as they should.
0 votes
by
If a 12 year old was given the same punishment as an *****, would that mean they'd have to share a prison cell with an ***** too and group shower with them etc?
0 votes
by
Depends on the crime. Premeditated murder should be tried as an *****.
0 votes
by
I think 18 should remain the legal age. That is the age to vote, go in the Service, and other ***** life choices. I think the variable should be past the age of 16 if required.
0 votes
by
if they are old enough to do the crime then they are old eough to do the time. people who had thier houses broken into, or have been robbed , o have had their prperty damaged or beaten up or any other crime that these kids do do not feel any less grief if the offender is a teenager or if they are 50. the impact on thier life is the same . we are way too soft witht hem when we should be coming down tough on them while they are young so they understand conseqences
0 votes
by
Whatever age they can comprehend right from wrong. Some ******** belong in jail.
0 votes
by
For some things, I think 16 qualifies... otherwise, 18 is a good age.
0 votes
by
16
0 votes
by
Thirteen
0 votes
by
Depends on the crime.
...