ATTN: Sodahead Administration... We have minors in this site and inappropriate posts should be control and banned.

0 votes
asked Aug 18, 2016 in Living by admin (21,700 points)

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

38 Answers

0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
What inappropriate posts? Is "gene" back again?
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
How about we let their parents do the policing.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Excuse me? I'm pretty sure me and every other teen on here aren't offended by these posts. We have more inappropriate conversations with each other than what I see on here..
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
I have no problem with that.

What are we going to deem inappropriate for these kiddies?
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
No. The term Minor needs to be eliminated. God says work no ill for a good reason. Mans laws are made to entrap people to do ill to people.They are young people.God does not hide any of what he made from our eyes no matter what the age.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Stop the infernal banning! God is not happy when people make people think that God what God made deserves a negative name.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
The devil wants the Adam and Eve innocents of Children to be forbidden too see what God made making God evil in their minds to subconsciously dislike what God made. Let all ages into furry conventions even as children are allowed to walk about in naked nature and walk around zoo seeing animals that are naked too. Let them see the sexual organs real or fake. They are made by God. People need to stop making our young ones think God is somehow evil for making them.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
People seeing any part of the body as inappropriate sees the entire body as inappropriate. Satan thinks banned. People need to have Jesus in them to see Jesus in another. Jesus would not look at Jesus saying I ban this or that. Not doing what Jesus would do is swearing taking his name in vain. Art should not be divided anywhere. Satan is the one who divides. I want furry conventions to be allowed to show all art together. Furries should be allowed to make their furry suits to look exactly the way they want them in every detail even as God made life to show every detail. There should be zero rejection of any part. Reject any part reject the whole body.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
You are not responsible for what you do to the one who made all? Your words are not perverted? How so. All things people did not make are not nude?
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Just what we need. More censorship. NOT! It's the parents job to teach the kids. Not someones job to take away someones freedom of speech so they don't offend. Your forgetting how good the PC crap is going.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Loved most of your post but I have a hard time raving your 4 letter explicative. ;-)
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
you have a point here ..
there's some things that are just completely INAPPROPRIATE for minors ..
(and since the site allows minors as young as 13 (and I know there's those younger than that .. who have LIED about their age too) these things are just troubling .. )

(plus, even as an adult .. there's some things that are just best left PERSONAL and private .. not out there in such an obvious way .. )
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Who's to judge what is inappropriate and what is not? Kids hear worse on the television and the radio.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Yes you are right and we need to stand up and stop giving money to those who put out such trash.

Jerry Rubin was NOT right.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
im not sure about this...
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
I think we should raise the SodaHead age limit to 21.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
I'd rather ban the minors.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
really meme
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
"They start them on porn in grade school".............What kind of school are you sending your kids too?
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
I think you need to read this before you post questions like this.
Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
I sure do agree. It is not often that I see somethind inappropriate but it does happen.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Love the grammar.
"on"
"controlled"
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
American english is not her first language.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
I'm inappropriate; you're inappropriate; we're ALL inappropriate.
(think of Al Pacino while you read that.)
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Disagree, do an age verification if you want but not censorship.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Inappropriate is subjective, not objective.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
BS!
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
What? You're delusional. Oh I see, there's minors so censorship its a must now.

Minors should be studying, doing homework, playing sports, riding bicycles, etc. not engaging in grown ups conversations or things they know nothing about. If they do, they must be mature enough to not find it boring thus not being offended or disturbed by "inappropriate posts"
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Inappropriate posts? I haven't seen anything inappropriate. I must be looking in the wrong places.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Listen the perversion they are being taught today in school is way worse than anything on here! Kids in school today would be hard to shock! They start them on porn in grade school after all! I have no problem here but I'm sure the crap they do at school I would never sit through! Perversion holds no interest for me!
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Huh?
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
This is a very tame site IMO. I have never seen anything "inappropriate " here. Teens today know so much more about edgy topics than we did at their ages. I am sure they are not shocked by anything they read. And who is going to edit the posts? The posters ' police ? Let 's leave these issues to the parents and get on with our lives.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Be a parent. Monitor your kids while they are on the internet.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Agree
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
I think parents need to monitor what their children are viewing online. Don't assume that the internet will babysit your children or that the adults online will always be on the up and up.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
What are minors doing on this site in the first place...I always thought you had to supply your D.O.B etc...so IF there are minors on here it's Sodaheads fault and problem...not mine or anyone elses
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
What our teen members need to understand here is that this isn't about if they're bothered. It about whether it's appropriate and/or legal for adults to converse directly to minors in ways that cross the line; like sexually. I think there are times here when the cyberworld makes it difficult to remember that some of our members are younger than our own children.
But at the same time, not everyone here is honest about their age. So caution all of the time is a good policy.
0 votes
answered Aug 18, 2016 by Anonymous (2,291,900 points)
Should I give up my privilege to participate in an open forum because some adults allow their minor children access to the site. Unequivocally NO!!! If minors are allowed to visit the site, then it is not the responsibility of the SH administration to censor the material, it is the responsibility of the adults to supervise the minors. A daunting task on the WWW and on a open forum.
...