0 votes
in Living by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

39 Answers

0 votes
by
Whatever is Best for the *****.
Joint custody should be established, with physical custody going to the better parent. It's all about the well being of the *****. 'Nuff said \m/
0 votes
by
The more feminine one. (jk)
0 votes
by
This question has an obvious answer. Whichever parent is best suited to take care of the ***** should gain custody. Their ****** orientation is irrelevant.
0 votes
by
The best parent should always get custody, regardless of gender
0 votes
by
And, how, would that be determined? Normally the BIO, has more legal clout in court.
0 votes
by
Take into consideration if one partner has cheated or is less financially able to provide or is less available for the ***** or has a criminal record or is physically/verbally/emotionally abusive/manipulative or if the ***** expresses a preference etc.. The same way it's determined in heterosexual relationships where both the parents are biological. Sometimes it's **** to determine, sometimes it's obvious, sometimes it takes some investigation. Either way, the biological parent isn't necessarily the best-suited for raising the *****
0 votes
by
Based on your possible answers your question is not worth answering. It's just another self serving question.
0 votes
by
It's what many law profs in top universities are discussing in preparation for new case law.

Self-serving? lol
0 votes
by
So they are giving you multiple choice rather than hearing your own opinion?
0 votes
by
it should be decided exactly the same as if the couple were not ***
0 votes
by
****. I thought this was gonna be a tough one.

Of course, for the malcontents, we could always go the Solomon route. :-)
0 votes
by
Well, it is a little different, AS only one, is the BIO PARENT.
0 votes
by
Just like when it's a man and a woman. Far too often I hear of ******** going to mentally ill, abusive mothers rather than supportive fathers, its heartbreaking, and I don't see why this should be any different.

If it's just two people not being able to work things out, then blood is an obvious heavy consideration; but if the kid's bio-dad is an *******, and the kid loves and is supported by the other, then why choose to place a ***** in a dysfunctional home?
0 votes
by
If no biological parent exists then you cannot factually answer this question. Perhaps the answer is in the fact that those of the same *** cannot reproduce. Good Luck!
Bcounted
0 votes
by
And in the case of adopted ********? Shouldn't the same criteria be used for adopted ******** of hetero marriages: whatever is best for the *****.
0 votes
by
******** the parents involved has adopted the ********. Yes, the same criteria should be part of the consideration. Again, in either case there is no factual conclusion. Now for the "fireworks".... I also believe you must make considerations from the "fact" they are ***.
Bcounted
0 votes
by
This is a no-brainer. Of course the best interests of the ***** require that the best parent get the *****.
0 votes
by
I wonder why the *** qualification needs to be added to this question.
The usual criteria should apply.
0 votes
by
The one the brat came out of how about that ! You know "mom" and as for dad he's an unstable individual needs to rethink things over before taking a super responsibility as a parent this is why we have jeffrey dahmers and john wayne gacies
0 votes
by
Whichever partner nurtured the ***** the most should get primary custody and shared custody should go to the other partner. If it can be demonstrated that each partner contributed an equal share of the nurture of the *****, an equally shared custody arrangement should be ********.
0 votes
by
Trick question, *** couples can't reproduce
0 votes
by
If they both adopted than yes. If one is the biological and the other an adoptive parent, then the biological as long as they were determined fit. However if the other person did not adopt they don't have a right and the ***** may *** up in foster care.
0 votes
by
If there is not going to be joint custody, then the parent who is best for the interests of the ***** should get custody.
0 votes
by
and when the ***** is old enough to think for themselves THEY SHOULD be able to make a THAT DECISION.. IT IS about WHERE they are safe and happy
0 votes
by
Shared custody or whatever is best for the *****. How is it any different than who gets custody of an adopted *****? It depends on the situation.
0 votes
by
The one who can provide for it.
0 votes
by
....they should share custody just like any other divorce couple....
0 votes
by
Don't they have a 'turn in' service at the Pound..?
0 votes
by
Well, I think they should both have a right to custody (if they both want to and are both qualified). But if only one was to get custody, it should be given to the best parent. This should apply to all couples (regardless of ****** orientation or gender).
0 votes
by
Each partner gets a half of the *****.
0 votes
by
Barney Frank should get custody.
0 votes
by
Custody should be settled in the court, like it would be for any heterosexual couple.
0 votes
by
Biology plays a big part in most divorce precedings that have only one biological parent
0 votes
by
That is terrible, but I usually think most of the court system stinks.
0 votes
by
I agree that the courst system stinks. What's really scary is that it seems to be the best one in the world.

:D
0 votes
by
Like any ***** custody case, the best interest of the ***** should be the primary and only factor.
0 votes
by
Whoever is best for the *****
0 votes
by
Wow. There will be more and more cases like this. Rosie O'donnel, on her third. Fourth?
0 votes
by
Beccause biology is a big determinent in a hetero couple, and this would be new case law
...